In the autumn of 2022 a legal-technology company asked us a single question and gave us a quarter to answer it: does the UAE contain enough in-house legal teams, reviewing enough contracts, to justify a country strategy.

That is a good brief. It is specific, it is falsifiable, and it has an end date.

We built the target list from the organisations that generate contracts by the hundred: developers, banks, holding groups, and the law firms who serve them. Over three months we booked 49 meetings with 47 of them, in a market where the company had no name, no local presence and no reference customer.

The moment the answer arrived

It came as a question from a prospect, relayed by our rep in the working chat.

Could the tool proofread handwritten amendments made to a document.

Everything about the engagement is in that sentence. The product read contracts beautifully. It read files. In a market where a negotiated agreement still comes back from the other side with pen marks in the margin, and where a signed annexe is often a photograph taken in a meeting room, the boundary of what the software could do was not its intelligence. It was the paper.

Once we had heard that three times, the honest answer to the client's question was: yes, the buyers exist, and no, not yet, not in this form.

Why the honest version is the valuable one

There is a strong commercial temptation, at the end of a short engagement, to write the encouraging version. Interest was high. The market is emerging. A further six months would let us build on the momentum.

Every agency has written that paragraph. It sells a renewal and it costs the client a year.

We reported what the market told us, on the schedule we had agreed, including the inconvenient half, and the engagement ended when it was supposed to.

The postscript is the argument for doing it that way. The people behind that company went on to recommend us to other founders, unprompted, as the agency to talk to about this region. Word of mouth from a client whose answer was "not yet" turned out to be worth more than a testimonial from one whose answer was easy, because the recommendation carries information: these people will tell you the truth on a schedule.

How to buy one of these properly

If you are the client, three things make a market test work.

Write the question down before anyone starts. Not "explore the UAE". Something you could be wrong about.

Agree what a no looks like. Which observations would settle it. Otherwise the finding is negotiable, and a negotiable finding becomes an extension.

Ask for the objections verbatim. Aggregate reporting hides the sentence that matters. The handwritten-amendments question would have disappeared into a bullet about "product fit concerns" in any summary written for a board.

A market test is not a small growth engagement. It is a different product with a different deliverable, and the deliverable is an answer.

book_a_call